hcard
05-21 09:25 AM
Senate Floor to Start Debating the Emergency Iraq War Supplemental Spending Bill This Morning
As reported earlier, the immigrant community has a huge stake at this bill because of the immigration bill amendments attached to this bill by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The Democratic leadership intends to push this legislative bill and pass it before they go into a Memorial holiday break. There are two challenges ahead for this legislation. One is the right wing Republican Senators who declared their plan to engage in a cat-and-dog fight against this bill, particularly AgJOBS bill of Senator Feinstein which they consider an amnesty bill. The drama of confrontation between the Democratic majority and the Republican minority will unfold in the form of cloture motion to be pushed by the Democrats and the Repulicans attempt to block the motion and to introduce amendments to kill the controvertial amendments. We do not know how Sen. Ted Kennedy's hospitalization will affect in the drama. As people know it, Sen. Kennedy is diagnosed with a brain tumor and his availability in the Senate floor activities remains open at this point. Aside from this challenge, there is another challenge ahead on the other side in the Beltway. It is the White House. Reportedly, President Bush has expressed his intention to veto this bill because of the conditions attached to this bill on the Iraq War. We should hold breath for the next 10 days to watch how all of the drama will unfold and in what way, the curtain will pull down.
http://www.immigration-law.com/Canada.html
As reported earlier, the immigrant community has a huge stake at this bill because of the immigration bill amendments attached to this bill by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The Democratic leadership intends to push this legislative bill and pass it before they go into a Memorial holiday break. There are two challenges ahead for this legislation. One is the right wing Republican Senators who declared their plan to engage in a cat-and-dog fight against this bill, particularly AgJOBS bill of Senator Feinstein which they consider an amnesty bill. The drama of confrontation between the Democratic majority and the Republican minority will unfold in the form of cloture motion to be pushed by the Democrats and the Repulicans attempt to block the motion and to introduce amendments to kill the controvertial amendments. We do not know how Sen. Ted Kennedy's hospitalization will affect in the drama. As people know it, Sen. Kennedy is diagnosed with a brain tumor and his availability in the Senate floor activities remains open at this point. Aside from this challenge, there is another challenge ahead on the other side in the Beltway. It is the White House. Reportedly, President Bush has expressed his intention to veto this bill because of the conditions attached to this bill on the Iraq War. We should hold breath for the next 10 days to watch how all of the drama will unfold and in what way, the curtain will pull down.
http://www.immigration-law.com/Canada.html
wallpaper golden temple amritsar a view
ItIsNotFunny
10-31 04:28 PM
Is It Not Funny? It is not funny ItIsFunny!
I hope you sent mails.
I hope you sent mails.
gevgelija50
11-28 07:59 PM
As I understand the process, if your date is current, the USCIS will accept your application - meaning they ARE processing applications with a priority date matching or exceeding yours.
During the July 2007 fiasco, the cut-off dates were current, allowing everyone to apply. If we submitted our application and the date is current at the time, why do we have to wait until our date becomes current again? Shouldn't they process the application within 6 months or less?
During the July 2007 fiasco, the cut-off dates were current, allowing everyone to apply. If we submitted our application and the date is current at the time, why do we have to wait until our date becomes current again? Shouldn't they process the application within 6 months or less?
2011 golden temple amritsar
ram006
07-16 09:01 PM
Hi,
My wife's 485 is rejected with the following reason "The application/petition was filed on the outdated version of this form". The rejection notice has a receive date of July 1st 2010 and a LIN number. Now the problem-
My 485 was approved on July 8th, 2010 and I received a "Welcome to USA" notice on July 12th. My H1 has expired on July 14th, 2010 along with wife's H4 and our I-94's. We applied for both the H extensions in may. Now if we resubmit the 485 with the new application will the USCIS honor the July 1st receive date?
My main concern is on her status, any input will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
My wife's 485 is rejected with the following reason "The application/petition was filed on the outdated version of this form". The rejection notice has a receive date of July 1st 2010 and a LIN number. Now the problem-
My 485 was approved on July 8th, 2010 and I received a "Welcome to USA" notice on July 12th. My H1 has expired on July 14th, 2010 along with wife's H4 and our I-94's. We applied for both the H extensions in may. Now if we resubmit the 485 with the new application will the USCIS honor the July 1st receive date?
My main concern is on her status, any input will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
more...
harrydr
12-07 04:46 PM
Hello,
Basic question to my current situation and my plans for the future.
If i wait until my PD becomes current for me to file I-485 and once filling is done and i wait 6 months from the filling date to change my job,
1. Am i limited to change jobs only in the same corporation.
2. If not and i decide to start a new job (after 6 months of filling I-485 obviously) with a new corporation can the old company revoke my I-140 and I -485.
3. If yes, then does that mean i would have to start fro the beginning with the new company for my GC processing??
Thanks in advance for answering this complex situation.
Basic question to my current situation and my plans for the future.
If i wait until my PD becomes current for me to file I-485 and once filling is done and i wait 6 months from the filling date to change my job,
1. Am i limited to change jobs only in the same corporation.
2. If not and i decide to start a new job (after 6 months of filling I-485 obviously) with a new corporation can the old company revoke my I-140 and I -485.
3. If yes, then does that mean i would have to start fro the beginning with the new company for my GC processing??
Thanks in advance for answering this complex situation.
sparky123
07-18 09:45 AM
I guess as long as your PD is before july 31, you can apply,
PD is the date labor was applied and not approved. Hence Any approvals from Aug 1 to aug 16 should be fine too...
PD is the date labor was applied and not approved. Hence Any approvals from Aug 1 to aug 16 should be fine too...
more...
sri1973
07-18 03:26 PM
Hello All,
Brief History: I am working for a Food Processing company (A) in R&D. Company A was my sponsor for GC. I have been on EAD since Oct 2007 (filed 485 during July-Aug 2007 time period) :) . My I-140 was approved Jan 2007. My GC application was started in Apr 2006 - Perm process. Also, i still have my H1B(Extension) valid until Apr 2010. Company A uses a consulting firm for roughly about 25 - 35% of R&D projects.
Reason to change: I believe this opportunity will have a significant change/growth to my career.
Questions: :confused: Can i change my job to the consulting firm using EAD? What are the consequences i should expect from USCIS? Does the Consulting company have to get involved with any Immigration fillings?
If i decide to work for the consulting firm, i will still be doing the same job for Company A but as a consultant + I will have additional projects with other Food Processing companies. I think labor application job description won't change (Company A to Consulting Firm) and this is where i struggle to understand the rules. Need your thoughts and Advice.
Appreciate your help and Thanks for your time.
Brief History: I am working for a Food Processing company (A) in R&D. Company A was my sponsor for GC. I have been on EAD since Oct 2007 (filed 485 during July-Aug 2007 time period) :) . My I-140 was approved Jan 2007. My GC application was started in Apr 2006 - Perm process. Also, i still have my H1B(Extension) valid until Apr 2010. Company A uses a consulting firm for roughly about 25 - 35% of R&D projects.
Reason to change: I believe this opportunity will have a significant change/growth to my career.
Questions: :confused: Can i change my job to the consulting firm using EAD? What are the consequences i should expect from USCIS? Does the Consulting company have to get involved with any Immigration fillings?
If i decide to work for the consulting firm, i will still be doing the same job for Company A but as a consultant + I will have additional projects with other Food Processing companies. I think labor application job description won't change (Company A to Consulting Firm) and this is where i struggle to understand the rules. Need your thoughts and Advice.
Appreciate your help and Thanks for your time.
2010 golden temple images.
tcsonly
07-24 11:43 AM
Can you please point me to the thread? Thank you.
Take some time to search the forums before starting new threads.
The answer to your question is under Greencard retrogression. It's the first sticky thread with title: " All Priority date transfers and issues discussed here".
Admins: Please close this thread.
-C.
Take some time to search the forums before starting new threads.
The answer to your question is under Greencard retrogression. It's the first sticky thread with title: " All Priority date transfers and issues discussed here".
Admins: Please close this thread.
-C.
more...
Imigrait
08-08 12:52 PM
Check this Thread.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12093
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12093
hair Swar International
DCQC
08-02 07:08 PM
I googled it
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb-rr-31-uscis-sop-02-0807.pdf
Dude that is dated Feb 08, 2007
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/cisomb-rr-31-uscis-sop-02-0807.pdf
Dude that is dated Feb 08, 2007
more...
webm
08-28 10:44 AM
Make sure your spouse has valid AP on hand while she travel to overseas...so that she return using AP at POE..so AP is must at this point as her AOS is still pending...
Also get advice from your lawyer in advance..
Also get advice from your lawyer in advance..
hot Golden Temple, Amritsar, India
stemcell
06-16 09:22 AM
Thank You.
more...
house to the Golden Temple
Rb_newsletter
10-05 09:35 PM
I saw in one of the thread one attorney said this kind of RFEs are not problem. I will post the link if I find that thread.
See if you can get a copy of the original birth certificate from the school. if you can get it, just notarize it and submit the notarized copy.
See if you can get a copy of the original birth certificate from the school. if you can get it, just notarize it and submit the notarized copy.
tattoo The Golden Temple of Amritsar:
pom
10-20 06:53 PM
I had to hurt my eyes for 10 minutes to see that one... Very nice :)
more...
pictures The Golden Temple
kisana
02-27 09:21 PM
Please provide any suggestion. I am waiting on this.
dresses Golden Temple, Amrisar.
martinvisalaw
06-18 01:10 PM
You should ask both law firms to send you your 485 paperwork, assuming you are listed as the client. they might not send you any I-140 documents, since this was the employer's filing, but the 485 documents should give you what you need. You should write to CIS saying that you are no longer represented by attorneys and ask them to send all documents directly to you. Unfortunately, CIS can be very slow in acknowledging these requests, so it is likely that correpondence will continue to go to one or both attorneys.
more...
makeup The Golden Temple at Night
freddyCR
January 2nd, 2005, 08:14 PM
The Mediterranean showing some spunk.
Comments welcome :)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/coldshore1ed-med.jpg
Comments welcome :)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/alcorjr2/coldshore1ed-med.jpg
girlfriend reflections of Golden Temple
Blog Feeds
07-07 08:10 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
hairstyles Golden temple
jthomas
05-04 02:35 AM
Maybe USCIS would earn more income by telling the illegal immigrants to file EAD/I-485/Biometics every year etc.. Immigration attroneys would earn good money by replying to RFEs for 12 million immigrants. Getting this 12 million illegal immigrants legalized will surely improve the economy.
Everybody would be kept in the same backlog as we are. Illegal immigrants will stand in a que behind the legal immigrants. so you got the point
Everybody would be kept in the same backlog as we are. Illegal immigrants will stand in a que behind the legal immigrants. so you got the point
h1-b forever
08-31 09:43 AM
In this economy it is hard to get the employer to file for us again.........:(
sathan9890
03-30 08:01 PM
Thanks Aruben. I think you meant '...requesting validity date of 12/2011'
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق